🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim endured a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority In Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.